Follow by Email

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Reiki – scientific point of view

1.1. Reiki as a complementary and alternative medicine technique
The number of people seeking complementary alternative medicine (CAM) as a way to address their health care needs has increased significantly over the last several decades. CAM is expected to continue to play an augmented role in medical practice, including cancer treatment [1-4]. Reiki is biofield medicine, originally from Japan, which involves subtle body energies. The evaluation of Reiki as a treatment includes basic research [5-14], clinical trials [16-21], and self-reported assessment [5-24]. However, the understanding of Reiki as a method of medical treatment remains primitive at best [5]. Even research on the Reiki treatment of cancer patients primarily focused on the side effects rather than on the fundamental aspects of Reiki affecting cancer cells [7-9]. In contrast, there exist a substantial number of basic scientific studies on other biofield modalities for cancer treatment such as Gigong, Johrei, spiritual healing, etc. [25-31]. While the majority of these reports show positive results, they are rarely replicated, and some of them do not support previously reported data of positive effects of spiritual healing on malignant cell growth in vitro.
1.2. Scientific explanation of Reiki action
1.2.1. Theories explaining the mechanism of biological action of electromagnetic fields

The mechanism of low electromagnetic frequencies (LEMF) affecting biological tissues had been studied in the former USSR and, recently, in the USA and Europe. Although the mechanism is not clear, research provides some likely hypotheses. There are two explanations for this phenomenon. The first one is based on a principle in physics of electromagnetic radiation and cell structure. Endogenic LEMF could be generated by signals from endogenic LEMF resonating in the cell membrane, which, in turn, starts the regenerative processes [32-41]. The important point is that LEMF can affect all levels of body organization, not just the cellular level. Moreover, the induction of coherent waves is a natural mechanism of bioregulation. The cells start to emit LEMF waves after the transition from steady state to altered homeostasis state. The endogenic LEMF helps to return cells to the normal homeostasis state. If, for some reason, cells are not able to produce the endogenic LEMF, it is possible to help them return to the normal homeostasis state by exogenic LEMF exposure [42-46].
The second explanation of LEMF influence on living objects is based on chemical theory and the structural properties of water. It also says that LEMF fields are characteristic of all living systems, but the first target of LEMF radiation is the water (not the cell membrane). The structure of water could be enhanced by LEMF and, after that, it provides a signal through a triggering mechanism to the proteins in a cell membrane [34,47]. Water should be considered an active participant, if not a solicitous "cradle" for vital processes, rather than just a solvent for biomolecules [48,49]. Further research on this phenomenon has been done [50-55]. Also, the "memory of water" has been described [56-59].
Thus, it has been shown that mechanisms in nature exist, by which exogenic LEMF could influence endogenic LEMF and regulate processes in an organism.

1.2.2. Therapies based on LEMF
Therapy of various illnesses based on the LEMF has been described in the late 1960s and has been studied in various countries, including the former USSR, Canada, France, and Germany. The quantum therapy method uses frequencies from 5 to 250 Hz. It has been suggested that healing effects might occur through a resonance-type interaction, since some of the biomolecules and structural elements of the cells have their own theoretically calculated resonant frequency within this range [60]. Moreover, it has been shown that oncogenic and the associated quantum genetic particles were induced electromagnetically into recrystallized and translocated states based on various quantum phenomena [61-63]. The effectiveness of LEMF in treating various diseases, even in oncology, has been shown [64-72].
1.2.4. Measurements of electromagnetic fields from healer’s body and living objects
A.G. Gurwitch, in 1923, was the first to postulate the existence of a unifying organizing principle for all manifestations of life the existence of a vectorial "biological field." According to Gurwitsch, this field performs the organizing function for all vital processes taking place in its realm [73-76]. Dr. Zimmerman observes distinct changes in the fields in the healer’s body: biofields produced by a healer's hand. He recorded a pulsed signal of variable frequency ranging from 0.3 to 30 Hz, with most of the activity in the 7–8 Hz range [77,78].
Recently, various measurements have been done in these fields: measuring the aura during a procedure known as "Rolfing" using a modified electromyographic device [79]; measuring the emission of microwave radiation from tissue under stress [80]; bio-electric fields being made visible with a system that converts the bio-electrical field's electrons to photons [81]; and ultra weak emission of biophotons from biological tissues [73,76, 82-105]. Also, fundamental theories about biophotons and cell growth and differentiation, essential differences between tumor tissue and normal ones, some experimental evidence of DNA as a source of biophotons, and theoretical models have been provided [106,107]. Dramatic and unique differences before and after Reiki energy attunements or treatments have been shown by Kirlian photography [108]. It indicates that, in a Reiki session, the balance of biofield around the fingers is increased. According to the mechanism of healing described above, it could be due to increases in LEMF/biophoton emission from the Reiki healer. We could then conclude that Reiki attunement increased the emitting flow. The healing process of Reiki could be due to the action of exogenic LEMF (for the patient’s body) emitted from the Reiki healer’s hand, which was in perfect resonance with the endogenic patient’s body LEMF and restored body balance. Also, we could not exclude the possibility that these exogenic LEMF could damage cancer cells by itself not only through a body recovery mechanism. It is possible because of the differences in frequencies between normal and cancer cells mentioned above. In this case, Reiki will work like chemotherapy, directly destroying the ill cells. Our confidence is also based on the novel theory combined through all research on biofield: the Reiki nature, which includes characterization of endogenous energy fields in health and disease; and an understanding of how they regulate physiologic processes [109].

1.3. Reasons for creating this type of protocol for the Reiki treatment

1.3.1. Hypothesis regarding the source of Reiki energy
We do not support the theory that Reiki energy is energy from an outside source, after reconciling the scientific data cited above and the point of view of Reiki founder, Dr. Mikao Usui. He stated in his original book, Usui Reiki Hikkei, even before the discovery of biophoton emission, [110,111]:”However, it could also be possible to call it physical therapy since energy and light radiate from all body parts of the person who is giving the treatment” and “Usui Reiki Ryoho has materialized the healing power that the human body has.” We assume that Reiki energy is the natural human LEMF energy, which is emitted from the human body. A few words could be said about outside sources of energy. Though all human beings and all other living beings have their own electrical-magnetic energy balance, they all exist in the flow of energies outside those of the earth, moon, sun, and other galactic fields. So, humans are capable of accepting these external energies and use these for body balance [112]. We could say that, all human beings, during their whole lifetime, use energy from outside sources to maintain their own energy level. And we could expect increasing ability to accept and transform that energy from outside sources after Reiki attunement, not channeling some sort of unique energy, which has been unreachable before attunement. Thus, Reiki energy is the own energy of the healer, with increasing natural ability of accepting and transferring energy from outside sources.

1.3.2. Hypothesis regarding possible mechanism behind the so-called “Reiki intelligence”

Sometimes, Reiki energy has been thought to be some kind of intelligence that leads to the ill part of the body. A living cell (like an entire living being) is an open system with a continuous flow of energy passing through it [49,52,113]. And, as water fills up every hole on earth, the energy fills up every energy hole in the body. We believe that Reiki-attuned people emit all spectra of LEMF frequencies, which could be in resonance with any type of information processes that are needed to restore balance in the organism. Thus, the so-called ‘Reiki intelligence” could be the visible results of resonance action of endogenic and exogenic LEMF.

1.3.3. Are there factors that could influence the Reiki treatment?

It is a well-known fact that, in this healing technique, the health, mind, or mood conditions of the healer have no influence on the quality of healing effects [49] The latest research on the healer’s mood as it influences the results of the Reiki treatment [114] seemed to be very confusing. For example, we see from Figure 1 [114] that the amounts of Reiki-treated bacteria in healing and nonhealing experiments (experiments with different moods of healers) are practically the same. The differences were noted only between control groups and these could be due to problems with the experiment protocol and settings and not the healers’ moods.
Also, "wrong information" or "ill energies" are never exchanged between the healer and the one being healed, irrespective of the health status of the former [49]. We agree with this statement because, in our understanding, the process called “acceptance of negative energy from patients” by un-attuned healers is not really accepting “ill energy” from patients. It is rather the decrease in self energy of un-attuned healers during the process of concentrating, creating the healing intent, emitting the LEMF, etc. And this decrease in self energy could cause tiredness or even illness among the un-attuned healers. In Reiki-attuned people, the decrease in self energy does not take place because they do not need to concentrate or create the healing intent. The ability to accept and transfer energies from outside sources to maintain body balance has increased among attuned people as well.

1.3.4. Can un-attuned people have the same effect on treatment as canReiki practitioners?

Research shows that untrained people could not influence healing, but other studies reveal no differences between results obtained from treatments done by a Reiki practitioner or a sham practitioner [115,116].
Therefore, we decided that, as a first step in our research, a blank-controlled method (untreated cells are used as control) and no sham practitioner would be used. We call our treatment biofield-Reiki because, without using a sham practitioner, we could not separate the effect of Reiki from the biofield effects. If any positive results will be obtained, then the next step will be the differentiation of these results according to Reiki training level among sham practitioners, Reiki practitioners, and Reiki masters.
1.4. The importance of using the cell model

The most important aspect in CAM research is to avoid, during the study of effectiveness, other possible contributing factors─e.g., the natural course or cyclic nature of the disease; placebo effect; spontaneous remission; misdiagnosis─all factors, which are present during the study of CAM with humans and even with animals [117-123]. The preferable way to achieve this goal is to use a cell model. Most Reiki practitioners consider it a spiritual treatment approach, which is based on the belief that, when spiritual energy is channeled through a Reiki practitioner, the patient’s spirit is healed, which, in turn, heals the physical body [124]. We do not support this position because we do not consider Reiki as spiritual healing but as a physical LEMF energy, which directly influences body structures such as organs and cells. So Reiki does not need to heal the spirit of the patient to activate tissue healing and even cell cultures isolated from the body could be influenced by Reiki energy as well as by biofield LEMF energy. Thus, the cell culture model could be used in Reiki research. We used well-characterized cancer cell lines to study the mechanism of response to biofield-Reiki action on cancer cells.

1. Maizes V, Schneider C, Bell I, Weil A. Integrative Medical Education: Development and Implementation of a Comprehensive Curriculum at the University of Arizona. Academic Medicine 2002; 7: 851-60.
2. Brokaw J., Tunnicliff G., Raess B., Saxon D. The Teaching of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in U.S. Medical Schools: A Survey of Course Directors. Academic Medicine. 2002;77: 876-81.
3. Barrett B, Complementary and alternative medicine: what’s it all about? WMJ 2001;100(7):20-6.
4. Roca HJ, Imes S. Integration: a synergistic approach to health/wellness. SCI Nurs 2001;18(3):134-37
5. Nield-Anderson L, Ameling A. The empowering nature of Reiki as a complementary therapy. Holist Nurs Pract 2000;14(3):21-9.
6. Wirth DP, Richardson JT, Eidelman WS. Wound healing and complementary therapies: a review. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 1996;2(4): 493-02.
7. Alandyly P, et al. Using Reiki to support surgical patients. J. Nurs. Care Qual. 1999;13(4): 89-91.
8. Sawyer J. The first Reiki practitioner in our operating room. Aorn J. 1998;67(3): 674-77.
9. Bullock M. Reiki: a complementary therapy for life. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 1997;14(1): 31-3.
10. Mansour A.A, Beuche M, Laing G. et al. A study to test the effectiveness of placebo Reiki standardization procedures developed for a planned Reiki efficacy study. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 1999;5(2):153-64
11. Hartwell B, Brewitt B. The Efficacy of Reiki Hands On Healing: Improvements in Adrenal, Spleen and Nervous Function as Quantified by Electro-Dermal Screening. Alternative Therapies magazine 1997;3(4): 89.
12. Wetzel W. Reiki healing: a physiological perspective, J. Holistic Nursing 1989; 7(1): 47-54.
13. Engebretson J, Wardell DW. Experience of a Reiki session. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine.2002;8(2): 48-53.
14. Wardell D.W. Engebretson J. Biological correlates of Reiki touch healing. J. Advanced Nursing 2001;33(4): 439-445.
15. Kumar RA, Kurup PA. Changes in the isoprenoid pathway with transcendental meditation and Reiki healing practices in seizure disorder. Neurol India 2003;51:211-214.
16. Olson K, Hanson J, Michaud M. A phase II trial of Reiki for the management of pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003;26(5):990-7.
17. Weze C, Leathard HL, Grange J, Tiplady P, Stevens G. Evaluation of healing by gentle touch in 35 clients with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8(1):40-9.
18. Post-White J, Kinney ME., Savik K, Gau JB, Wilcox C, Lerner I. Therapeutic massage and healing touch improve symptoms in cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2003;2(4):332-44.
19. Olson K., Hanson J. Using Reiki to manage pain: a preliminary study. Cancer Prev. Control 1997;1(2):108-13.
20. Miles P, True G. Reiki--review of a biofield therapy history, theory, practice, and research. Altern Ther Health Med 2003;9(2):62-72.
21. Gotay CC.. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Hawaii cancer patients. Hawaii Med J 1999;58(3):49-51, 54-5.
22. Giasson M, Bouchard L. Effect of therapeutic touch on the well-being of persons with terminal cancer. J Holist Nurs 1998;16(3):383-98.
23. Samarel N. Therapeutic touch, dialogue, and women’s experiences in breast cancer surgery. Holist Nurs Pract 1997;12(1):62-70.
24. Ai AL, Peterson C, Gillespie B, et al. Designing clinical trials on energy healing: Ancient art encounters medical science. Altern Ther Health Med 2001;7:83–88.
25. Yount G, Solfvin J, Moore D, et al. In vitro test of external qigong. BMC Complement Altern Med 2004;4:5-7.
26. Nash CB. Psychokinetic control of bacterial growth. J Soc Psychical Res 1982;51: 221.
27. Haraldsson E, Thorsteinsson T. Psychokinetic effects on yeast: an exploratory experiment. In Research in Parapsychology, Roll WC, Morris RL, Morris JD (eds) pp 20–21. 1973;Metuchen, HJ: Scarecrow
28. Pleass CM, Dey D. Conditions that appear to favor extrasensory interactions between homo sapiens and microbes. J Sci Exploration 2005; 4: 213–31.
29. Braud WG. Distant mental influence on rate of hemolysis of human red blood cells. J Am Soc Psychical Res 1990; 84: 1–24.
30. Zachariae R., Højgaard L, Zachariae C, Væth M, Bang B and Skov L. The effect of spiritual healing on in vitro tumour and viability – an experimental study. British Journal of Cancer 2005; 93: 538 – 43.
31. Chen K, He B. Preliminary studies of the effect of Qigong therapy on cancer. J Non-Locality and Remote Mental Interactions. 2001; 1:1-3
32. Andreev EA, Belyi MU, Sitko SP. Appearance of endogenic characteristically frequencies in human organism. Patent application, 1982; № 32-ОТ-10609.
33. Afromeev VI, Subbotina TN, Yashin AA. Possible mechanism of activation of endogenic electromagnetic fields of organism’s cells under exogenic irradiation. Millimetric waves in biology and medicine 1997;9-10:28-34.
34. Beckii OV, Devyatkov ND. Mechanism of interaction of electromagnetic waves with biological objects. Radiothechnique 1996;41(9):4-11.
35. Blumenfeld LA. Problems of biological physics. Science 1977; 336.
36. Yashin AA. Appearance of stochastic resonance in biosystems under influence of exogenic electromagnetic field and it role in free energy regulation. Physics of the Alive 2000; 8(2):14-28.

37. Opalinskaya AM, Agulova LP, Influence of natural and artificial electromagnetic fields on biological systems. Tomsk, 1984.
38. Nefedov EI, Protopov AA, Semencov AN. Interaction of physics fields with living matter (under redaction of Hadarcev AA.), Tula, Tula’s State University, 1995:180.
39. Nefedov EI, Protopov AA, Hadarcev AA. et al. Biophysics of fields and emissions and bioinformation. Part 1, physics-biological fundament of information processes in living matter,(Under redaction of Yashin AA.), Tula, Tuka’s State University, 1998:333.
40. Yakunov AV. Properties of mitosis of yeast cells in condiditions of electromagnetic isolation. Physics of the Alive 1997;5(1):55-59
41. Grubnik BP, Sitko SP, Shalimov AA. Experience of using of technology “Sitko MPT” for rehabilitation of oncology patients with lll-lV cancer. Physics of the Alive 1998;6(1): 97-102.
42. Saxena A, Jacobson J, Yamanashi W, Scherlag B, Lamberth J, Saxena B. A hypothetical mathematical construct explaining the mechanism of biological amplification in an experimental model utilizing picoTesla (PT) electromagnetic fields. Med Hypotheses 2003;60(6):821-39.
43. Jacobson JI. A look at the possible mechanism and potential of magneto therapy. J Theor Biol. 1991;149(1):97-119.
44. Jacobson JI. Exploring the potential of magneto-recrystallization of genes and associated structures with respect to nerve regeneration and cancer. Int J Neurosci 1992;64(1-4):153-65.
45. Jacobson JI, Jacobson resonance is the basis from which to evaluate potential hazard and therapeutic benefit from extrinsic magnetic fields. Panminerva Med. 1993;35(3):138-48.
46. Jacobson JI. Jacobson resonance: the coupling mechanism for weak electromagnetic field bioeffects, and a new way to approach magneto therapy. Panminerva Med. 1994;36(1):34-41.
47. Sitko S. The crucial evidence in favour of the fundamentals of physics of the alive. Physics of the Alive 1998: 6(1):6-10.
48. Szent-Györgyi A. Towards a new biochemistry. Science 1941;93:609.
49. Barberis L. Reiki: Esoteric therapy or quantum interaction? 3rd European Colloquium on Ethnopharmacolgy1st International Conference on Anthropology and History of Health and Disease 29th May - 2nd June, 1996, Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Univeristà di Genova
50. Del Giudice E, Doglia S, Milani M. et al. Magnetic flux quantization and Josephson behaviour in living system. Physica Scripta. 1989;40:786-91.
51. Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E, Microtubule oscillations. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1992;22(4): 235-44.
52. Hess B, Mikhailov A, Self-organization in living cells. Science 1994;264: 223-24
53. Webb SJ, Laser-Raman spectroscopy of living cells. Phys Reports 1980;60:201-24
54. Hameroff SR, Ultimate Computing Elsevier Science Publishers. Amsterdam. 1987: p 183
55. Davenas E. Beauvais F, Amara J., Oberbaum M, Robinzon B. et al. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature, 1988;333:816-18.
56. Emoto M. The Message from Water III: Love Thyself. 2006; published by Hay House.
57. Benveniste J, Jurgens P, Hsueh W,and Aissa J. Transatlantic Transfer of Digitized Antigen Signal by Telephone Link. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology - Program and abstracts of papers to be presented during scientific sessions AAAAI/AAI.CIS Joint Meeting, February 21-26, 1997.
58. del Giudice E, Preparata G, Vitiello G. Water as a free electric dipole laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988; 61:1085-88.
59. Del Giudice E, Doglia S, Milani M. Electromagnetic field and spontaneous symmetry breaking in biological matter. Nuclear Physics 1986; B275 [FS17] : 185-99.
60. Rojavin MA, Ziskin MC. Medical application of millimetre waves. From the Richard J. Fox Center for Biomedical Physics, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA, Q J Med 1998; 91:57–66
61. Jacobson JI. The mathematical framework essential for magneto-therapy in the treatment of genomic and associated disorders, including cancer, AIDS, and CNS regeneration. * . Panminerva Med. 1989;31(1):1-7.
62. Jacobson JI. A testable theoretical model for magnetotherapy potentially applicative to such diverse concerns as oncogenic, CNS trophic factor and viral disorders. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1990;27(1):58-62.
63. Jacobson J. Magneto recrystallization of genomic and associated structures potentially applicative to such diverse concerns as cancer, AIDS, and CNS regeneration. Chin Med J . 1991;104(12):1025-32.
64. Gaponuk PYa, Sherkovina TU, Urkova EA. et al. Research of clinical effectiveness of millimeter electromagnet waves for irradiation of various reflect zones of patients with gastro ulcers. In: Devyatkin ND. and Beckii OB editors. Millimeter waves in medicine, book of manuscripts; Moscow 1991;1:32-36.
65. Goncharova LN, Sobeckii VV, Afanas’eva TN. et al. Applicetion of KVCH teraphy and acupuncture for hypertonic illnees. In: Devyatkin ND. and Beckii OB editors. Millimeter waves in medicine, book of manuscripts; Moscow, 1991;1:67-70.
66. Devyatkin ND, Sevastyanova LA, Zubenkova ES. et al. Imfluence of millimeter waves on effectiveness of bone narrow transplantation, Radiobiology, 1988;28(3): 361-364
67. Zaporozhan VN, Rebrova TB, Hait OV. et al Medico biological aspects of millimeter irradiation; Moscow, Academy of science USSR, 1987, 21-34.
68. Lokshina OD, Grekova ND, Brai BV. et al. Influence of LEMF therapy on gemodynamic and physical activity of patients with stenocardia. In: Devyatkin ND. and Beckii OB editors. Millimeter waves in medicine, book of manuscripts; Moscow, 1991;1:52-58
69. Mincer OP, Dsublik AYa, Kuz’menko VM. Application of ELMF for patients with chronic bronhitus. In: Devyatkin ND. and Beckii OB editors. Millimeter waves in medicine, book of manuscripts; Moscow, 1991;1:135-150.
70. Moiseev VN., Konstantinov IV, Levykina IG. Results of patients with ishemic heart disease treatment with millimeter waves. In: Devyatkin ND. and Beckii OB editors. Millimeter waves in medicine, book of manuscripts; Moscow; 1991;1: 191.
71. Wahlstrom O. Stimulation of fracture healing with electromagnetic fields of extremely low frequency (EMF of ELF). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:293-301.

72.Nayci A, Cakmak M, Renda N. et al Effect of electromagnetic fields and early postoperative 5-fluorouracil on the healing of colonic anastomoses. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2004; 18(2):136-141
73. Gurwitsch AG. Über die nichtmateriellen Factoren embryonaler Formgestaltung. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 1914; 18:111-142.

74. Gurwitsch AG, Gurwitsch LD. Mitogenetic Radiation (in Russian). All-Union Institute for Experimental Medicine; Leningrad, 1934.
75. Gurwitsch AG, Gurwitsch LD. L'analyse mitogénétique spectrale. Herman & Cie., éditeur;, Paris, 1934.
76. Gurwitsch AG, Gurwitsch LD. Der Feldbegriff in seiner Anwendung auf das Problem der Zellteilung. Acta Biotheoretica (Leiden), Series A, 1936;2(2):77-92.
77. Zimmerman J., 'New technologies detect effects of healing hands', Brain/Mind Bulletin 1985; 10(2):20-23.
78. Zimmerman J, The laying-on of hands, healing and therapeutic touch: a testable theory BEMI Currents Journal of the Bio-Electromagnetics Institute 1990;2: 9–17.
79. Hunt V, Electronic evidence of auras, chakras in UCLA study. Brain Mind Bull 1978;3(9):1-2.
80. Edrich J, New device detects microwave emissions in biological systems. Brain Mind Bull 1982;7(3): 1-3.
81. Dumitrescu F, Life energy patterns visible via a new technique. Brain Mind Bull, 1982;7914):1.
82. Ruth B. In: Popp, F.A./Becker, G./König, H.L./Peschka, W. editors. Experimental investigations on ultraweak photon emission. Electromagnetic Bio-Information. Urban & Schwarzenberg; Vienna-Baltimore 1979, 107-122.
83. Colli L. Facchini U. et al. Further measurements on the bioluminescence of seedlings. Experientia, 1955;11:479.
84. Coli L, et al. Light emission by germinating plants. Nouvo Cimento, 1954;12:150.
85. Zhuravlev A. Svecheniye Zhivykh Tkanei (Luminescence of Living Tissues, in Russian). Nauk;, Moscow, 1966.

86. Zhuravlev A. Ultraweak Luminescence in Biology (in Russian). Transactions of the Moscow Society of Naturalists. Nauka Publishers; Moscow. 1972.

87. Zhuravlev A, Akopyan VB. Ultrasvukovoye svechenie (Ultraweak Luminescence, in Russian). Nauka, Moscow 1977.

88. Zhuravlev A. Bioluminescence of Cells and Nucleic Acids. Plenum Press; New York, 1978.

89. Zhuravlev A. Spontaneous superlow chemiluminescence and creation of quantum biology. In: Jezowska-Trzebiatowska B. Kochel B. Slawinski J. Strek W. editors. Biological Luminescence. World Scientific Publishing; Singapore, 1990,19-48.
90. Seliger H.H. The origin of bioluminescence. Photochemistry and Photobiology 1975;21:355-361.

91.Ruth B. Experimental investigations on ultraweak photon emission. In: Popp FA. Becker G. König HL.Peschka W. editors. Electromagnetic Bio-Information. Urban & Schwarzenber;, Vienna-Baltimore 1979, 107-122.
92. Quickenden TI. Que H, Shane S. Weak luminescence from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the existence of mitogenetic radiation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 1974;60(2):764-770.
93. Popp FA. Lebensmittelqualitätsanalysen mithilfe der Biophotonik, Lebensmittel-Technologie, 2003;36 :7-8.
94. Inaba H, Kaneko N. Ichimura T. Sensitivity consideration and comparative study on detecting techniques of optical signals at ultra-low intensity. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 1969;QE-5(6):320.
95. Slawinska D, Slawinski J. et al. Chemiluminescence in the peroxidation of tannnic acids. Photochemistry and Photobiology 1979;30:71-80.

96. Slawinska D. Slawinski J. Chemiluminescence in the peroxidation of noradrenaline and adrenaline. In: Serio M. Pazzagli M. editors. Luminescent Assays: Perspectives in Endocrinology and Clinical Chemistry. Raven Press; New York 1982, 221-227.

97. Slawinska D, Slawinski J. Biological chemiluminescence (Yearly review). Photochemistry and Photobiology 1983;37(6):709-715.

98. Slawinska D, Slawinski J. Low-level luminescence from biological objects. In: Burr JG. Editor. Chemi- and Bioluminescence. Marcel Dekker, Inc.; New York 1985, 495-531.
99. Popp FA, Some features of biophotons and their interpretation in terms of coherent states. In: Beloussov L. Popp FA, Voeikov V, Wijk R. van (eds.): Biophotonics and Coherent Systems. Proceedings of the 2nd Alexander Gurwitsch Conference and Additional Contributions. Moscow University Press, Moscow 2000, pp.117-133.
100. Popp FA. Biophysikalische Grundlagen der Naturheilkunde. Allgemeine Homöopathische Zeitung, 2000;245(4 ):154-158.

101. Popp FA. Biophotons - background, experimental results, theoretical approach and applications. Res. Adv. in Photochem. & Photobiol. 2000;1:31-41.

104. Popp FA. Ganzheitlichkeit und Fragen der Ethik. Phänomenologie und wissenschaftlöiche Zusammenhänge. In: Peter-Alexander Müller (Hrsg.): Verantwortung und Ökonomie in der Heilkunde. Peter Lang; Frankfurt 2000, 85-101.
105. Grasso F, Musumeci F, Triglia A, Pagano M.Spectra of photons emitted form germinating seeds. Nuovo Cimento 1991;13 D: 891-897.
106. Popp FA. Properties of biophotons and their theoretical implications. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003;41:391-402.

107. Popp FA. Quantum Phenomena of Biological Systems as Documented by Biophotonics, in: Elitzur A, Dolev S, Kolenda N. editors. Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics? Springer; New York 2004, 371-396.
108. Reiki Energy of life. Traditional system and modern western approach, Borodkin VI. Editor.Vida-N; Moscow 2003, 67-69.
109. Rein G. Bioinformation Within the Biofield: Beyond Bioelectromagnetics, The journal of alternative and complementary medicicne, 2004;10(1):59–68.
110. Petter FA. Reiki The Legacy of Dr. Usui. Rediscovered documents on the orgins and developments of the Reiki system, as well as new aspects of the Reiki energy. Lotus Light publication;Shangri-LA 1999.
111. Usui Reiki Hikkei, from Andy Bowling
112. Bunnell T. A Tentative Mechanism for Healing,
113. Wahlstrom O. Stimulation of fracture healing with electromagnetic fields of extremely low frequency (EMF of ELF). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:293-301.
114. Rubik B, Brooks AJ, Schwartz GE. In vitro effect of Reiki treatment on bacterial cultures: Role of experimental context and practitioner well-being. J Altern Complement Med. 2006;12(1):7-13.
115. Shiflett SC, Nayak S, Bid C, Miles P, Agostinelli S., Effect of Reiki treatments on functional recovery in patients in poststroke rehabilitation: a pilot study, J Altern Complement Med., 2002; 8(6):755-63.
116.. Wardell DW, Engebretson J. Biological correlates of Reiki Touch(sm) healing., J Adv Nurs. 2001;33 (4):439.
117. Straus S. Complementary and Alternative Medicine Challenges and Opportunities for American Medicine. Academic Medicine. 2000;75: 572-573.
118. Tonelli M, Callahan T. Why Alternative Medicine Cannot Be Evidence-based. Academic Medicine. 2001;76: 1213-1220.
119. Beyerstein B. Alternative Medicine and Common Errors of Reasoning. Academic Medicine 2001;76:230-237.
120 Grollman A. Commentary #3 on Astin’s Special Theme Commentary. Academic Medicine. 2002;77: 871-873.
121. Ernst E. The need for scientific rigor in studies of complementary and alternative medicine. Am J Public Health, 2004; 94(7): 1074 - 1074.
122. Marcus D. M. Commentary #1 on Astin’s Special Theme Commentary. Academic Medicin. 2002;77: 869-870.
123. Astin J.A. Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the Need for Evidence-based Criticism. Academic Medicine. 2002;77: 864-868